Thursday, July 19, 2007

i am afraid of virginia woolf...

i a little bit do not know what to do with myself. but, faced with no structure, i find myself unable to stay away from virginia. i am reading her diaries now. i find her extremely comforting -- an affirmation of many aspects of my personality and of the habits of mine that i often find least explicable and most disconcerting. her descriptions even of her depressions are often lively, and i am relieved to learn she, too, could sometimes not read, often could not write, and explained long lapses in her diary writing by saying her mind had gone blank. she also was floored for weeks with headaches that couldn't be explained. her descriptions of vita are marked by a less articulate kind of biting -- her descriptions of other, less intimate people seem more fluent and precise -- and i suspect from this that she was more vulnerable to vita than others and so could see her less clearly. the mentions are often merely, "then, vita" or "tomorrow, vita." when she does describe her, she often centers on the physical, and i have a much better sense of the birch trees that were vita's legs than what she was like when she sat at virginia's feet on their visits -- other than that she was a dumb letter writer, wealthy and often behaved like a "schoolboy." but i have only gotten a few pages into orlando, which promises to complicate and deepen my impressions.

i am interested, also, in virginia's thoughts on what it meant to be a real woman and how she often does not feel like a real woman. this is especially brought out in her discussion of dress, how she never feels like she has anything to wear, how a new dress can make her feel more appropriate in society, how being teased for her hat made her feel so mortified and depressed.

i feel, for the first time, that i have found a literary ancestor that does not require a great amount of imagination and interpretation to identify with. a friend of mine, suspicious of the constant lesbian reinterpretation of fictions that i have increasingly relied on in order to see myself in the world, asks, really? were they really gay? and there is no question here, not only that vita and virginia slept together, but that they had a lesbian sensibility ... cataloging other 'sapphists,' often in a teasing, knowing way, taking on male pet names and imaginary characters (potto, orlando), and a certain ease with which they interrogate gender ... virginia, more than vita, wrote out of her alienation, her otherness, her queerness, while vita, it seemed, created a kind of lesbian world for herself (married a fag, is it true?).

and all this time, i have the indigo girls' song "virginia woolf" in my head and that exacerbates my sense that this exploration is a cliche one. the line that is lodged most smugly and persistently in my brain -- "they published your diaries/ and that's how i got to know you/ a key to a room of your own and a mind without end" -- makes me cringe. the flip side of the constant lesbian reinterpretation of "straight" fictions and lives is that overtly, heavily lesbian themes make me extremely self-conscious and uncomfortable.

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

vw + vs-w = <3

i finished this thick collection off in a day, unable to interrupt my eavesdropping on virginia and vita, no matter how i tried. i sensed that this was dangerous territory, that in watching dual performances of idealized selves fall in love and flirt and fuck and fight, i would surely find myself heartsore and longing. it is true. i think of vita, her small lips, her giant eyes, her young, exuberant devotion and admiration and i have the chest pains of a living crush. i think of quiet virginia, the slender crag, with her pride and brilliance and wish to be her reincarnation -- madness, illness, ennui and all -- if it meant i could one day hope to match her prose. how did virginia love vita so hard and still love leonard so well and perhaps even harder? how did she write these letters and still have the emotional time for novels and essays and equally-voluminous (if not equally-passionate) correspondences with other lovers, with friends and family? i am overwhelmed. even on blank days, i am lucky to wring three pages from the dry stone that is my brain. and of course, she was the virginia woolf and i am just me, but really, need the disparity be so insurmountable!? my main complaint with this collection is that virginia is too edited. in another collection of her letters (which i lost this weekend) one gets a better sense of her rhythms to vita, while in this collection we are lucky to two consecutive paragraph's from virginia without the maddening and enticing secrecy of the ". . . " in this particular collection, it is really vita who shines.

now, of course, i am off to read orlando and will probably be bedridden with all my swooning by the end of this.

Labels: , ,